Caleb Chen

#89 most-reconstructed of 451 tracked solvers · search their solves

Years
solves
14
best
3.71
mean
5.10
span
2024–2025
competitions
6

Solving style vs the field

Compared against 12287 reconstructed solves by 451 tracked solvers.

Average moves per stage

themfieldΔ
Cross10.311.4-1.1
F2L2829-1
OLL13.711.9+1.8
PLL8.613.1-4.5
Full solve60.665.5-4.9

Move tokens per reconstructed solve, split by stage - fewer than the field means a more move-efficient stage.

Techniques used

solvesthemfield
ZBLL428.6%11.0%
1LLL214.3%8.3%
ZBLS214.3%18.1%
2GLL17.1%3.4%

Share of solves using each last-slot / last-layer technique, vs the share across all tracked solves.

Algorithm choices

mainstreamfielddiffering cases
OLL36%58%5/9
PLL75%59%1/4

"Mainstream" = share of their executions using the field's most common alg for that case. A lower number than the field average means a more unusual alg sheet.

OLL algorithms

14 recognized executions · 36% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 58%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 5 of 9 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
OLL 24 differs3
y2 l' U' L U l F' L' F ×1 (15 solvers)
R' U' R U' R' U2 R' D' R U' R' D R U R U' ×1 (2 solvers)
U R U2 R' U2 R' U2 R U R U' R' U R' U R U' ×1 (1 solver)
r U R' U' r' F R F' (23%)
OLL 23 differs2
U' R' F' R U2 R' F R2 D2 r' U r D2 R' U ×1 (1 solver)
U' R U R2 D' R U R' D R2 U2 R' ×1 (2 solvers)
R2 D R' U2 R D' R' U2 R' (13%)
OLL 52 differs2
y2 R' F' U' F U' R U R' U R ×2 (15 solvers)
R U R' U R U' B U' B' R' (25%)
OLL 7 2
r U R' U R U2 r' ×2 (84 solvers)
r U R' U R U2 r' (97%)
OLL 16 1
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' ×1 (59 solvers)
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' (95%)
OLL 17 differs1
y2 F R' F' R U S' R U' R' S ×1 (4 solvers)
R U R' U R' F R F' U2 R' F R F' (59%)
OLL 27 1
R U R' U R U2 R' ×1 (100 solvers)
R U R' U R U2 R' (67%)
OLL 41 1
y2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R' U' F' ×1 (53 solvers)
y2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R' U' F' (88%)
OLL 42 differs1
y F R' F' R U2 R' U' R2 U' R2 U2 R ×1 (5 solvers)
R' U' R U' R' U2 R F R U R' U' F' (48%)

PLL algorithms

4 recognized executions · 75% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 59%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 1 of 4 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
F 1
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R ×1 (89 solvers)
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R (92%)
Ja 1
L' U' L F L' U' L U L F' L2 U L ×1 (29 solvers)
L' U' L F L' U' L U L F' L2 U L (40%)
Ua differs1
y R2 U' S' U2 S U' R2 ×1 (6 solvers)
R U R' U R' U' R2 U' R' U R' U R (39%)
Y 1
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' ×1 (94 solvers)
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' (96%)

Solves

14 recognized OLL executions across 9 cases, 4 recognized PLL executions across 4 cases - every solve links to its move-by-move breakdown.

tech
recon119113.712025-06-17CubingUSA Southeast Championship 20251LLL
cuberoot21353.712025-06-13Southeast Championship 20251LLL
recon115585.462025-03-10Queen City NC 2025ZBLL
recon115575.372025-03-10Queen City NC 20252GLL
recon115565.532025-03-10Queen City NC 2025
recon115554.922025-03-10Queen City NC 2025ZBLSZBLL
recon115544.962025-03-10Queen City NC 2025ZBLL
recon107443.792024-08-12Beach Bash Jacksonville 2024ZBLSZBLL
recon103848.102024-06-23Bama Big Cubes 2024
recon103835.232024-06-23Bama Big Cubes 2024
recon103824.672024-06-23Bama Big Cubes 2024
recon103815.912024-06-23Bama Big Cubes 2024
recon103805.742024-06-23Bama Big Cubes 2024
cuberoot13294.312024-03-23Clayton State Cubing 2024