Drew Brads

#65 most-reconstructed of 451 tracked solvers · search their solves

Years
solves
27
best
3.72
mean
8.17
span
2013–2019
competitions
5

Solving style vs the field

Compared against 12287 reconstructed solves by 451 tracked solvers.

Average moves per stage

themfieldΔ
Cross9.811.4-1.6
F2L31.729+2.7
OLL11.911.9±0
PLL15.713.1+2.6
Full solve69.265.5+3.7

Move tokens per reconstructed solve, split by stage - fewer than the field means a more move-efficient stage.

Techniques used

solvesthemfield
1LLL13.7%8.3%
VLS13.7%3.7%
ZBLS13.7%18.1%

Share of solves using each last-slot / last-layer technique, vs the share across all tracked solves.

Algorithm choices

mainstreamfielddiffering cases
OLL46%58%12/22
PLL59%59%5/12

"Mainstream" = share of their executions using the field's most common alg for that case. A lower number than the field average means a more unusual alg sheet.

OLL algorithms

26 recognized executions · 46% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 58%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 12 of 22 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
OLL 35 differs3
U2 R' U2 x' R2 U' R' U l' U2 R ×2 (1 solver)
U R U2 R' l' U l F' R U2 R' ×1 (2 solvers)
R U2 R2 F R F' R U2 R' (91%)
OLL 11 2
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' ×2 (40 solvers)
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' (83%)
OLL 50 2
r' U r2 U' r2 U' r2 U r' ×2 (21 solvers)
r' U r2 U' r2 U' r2 U r' (54%)
OLL 10 differs1
U' R U R' U l' U l F' R U2 R' ×1 (1 solver)
R U R' U R' F R F' R U2 R' (67%)
OLL 16 1
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' ×1 (59 solvers)
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' (95%)
OLL 18 differs1
y R U2 R2 F R F' U2 r R' U R U' r' ×1 (2 solvers)
r U R' U R U2 r2 U' R U' R' U2 r (32%)
OLL 24 differs1
y2 R' F' r U R U' r' F ×1 (16 solvers)
r U R' U' r' F R F' (23%)
OLL 25 differs1
F R' F' r U R U' r' ×1 (26 solvers)
y F' r U R' U' r' F R (20%)
OLL 26 differs1
y R U2 R' U' R U' R' ×1 (53 solvers)
R' U' R U' R' U2 R (36%)
OLL 28 differs1
r U R' U' R r' U R U' R' ×1 (6 solvers)
r U R' U' r' R U R U' R' (75%)
OLL 31 differs1
U2 R' U' F U R U' l' U' l ×1 (3 solvers)
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R (94%)
OLL 36 differs1
U L' U' L U' L' U L U r U' L' U x' ×1 (2 solvers)
y2 L' U' L U' L' U L U L F' L' F (63%)
OLL 37 1
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' ×1 (64 solvers)
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' (60%)
OLL 38 1
R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F' ×1 (64 solvers)
R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F' (96%)
OLL 4 differs1
M U' r U2 r' U' R U' R' M' ×1 (1 solver)
y' f R U R' U' f' U F R U R' U' F' (23%)
OLL 42 1
R' U' R U' R' U2 R F R U R' U' F' ×1 (42 solvers)
R' U' R U' R' U2 R F R U R' U' F' (48%)
OLL 51 differs1
f R U R' U' R U R' U' f' ×1 (27 solvers)
y2 F U R U' R' U R U' R' F' (57%)
OLL 56 differs1
r' U' r U' R' U R U' R' U R r' U r ×1 (1 solver)
r U r' U R U' R' U R U' R' r U' r' (43%)
OLL 57 1
R U R' U' M' U R U' r' ×1 (33 solvers)
R U R' U' M' U R U' r' (73%)
OLL 6 1
r U2 R' U' R U' r' ×1 (76 solvers)
r U2 R' U' R U' r' (93%)
OLL 7 1
r U R' U R U2 r' ×1 (84 solvers)
r U R' U R U2 r' (97%)
OLL 8 1
l' U' L U' L' U2 l ×1 (40 solvers)
l' U' L U' L' U2 l (48%)

PLL algorithms

22 recognized executions · 59% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 59%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 5 of 12 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
Ub differs4
y2 M2 U' M U2 M' U' M2 ×2 (33 solvers)
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 ×1 (43 solvers)
y2 R2 U R U R' U' R' U' R' U R' ×1 (55 solvers)
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 (31%)
Ua differs3
R2 U' R' U' R U R U R U' R ×2 (49 solvers)
y2 R U' R U R U R U' R' U' R2 ×1 (72 solvers)
R U R' U R' U' R2 U' R' U R' U R (39%)
F 2
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R ×2 (89 solvers)
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R (92%)
Jb 2
R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' ×2 (132 solvers)
R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' (96%)
T 2
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' ×2 (120 solvers)
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' (90%)
V 2
R' U R' d' R' F' R2 U' R' U R' F R F ×2 (45 solvers)
R' U R' d' R' F' R2 U' R' U R' F R F (33%)
Y 2
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' ×2 (94 solvers)
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' (96%)
Ga differs1
R2 u R' U R' U' R u' R2 F' U F ×1 (6 solvers)
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R D' (38%)
Gb differs1
l' f' U l R u R' U R U' R u' R2 U' ×1 (3 solvers)
y F' U' F R2 u R' U R U' R u' R2 (41%)
Gc 1
y2 R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 ×1 (55 solvers)
y2 R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 (55%)
Gd 1
R U R' U' D R2 U' R U' R' U R' U R2 D' ×1 (47 solvers)
R U R' U' D R2 U' R U' R' U R' U R2 D' (36%)
Rb differs1
R' U2 R' D' R U' R' D R U R U' R' U' R ×1 (35 solvers)
R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R2 (63%)

Solves

26 recognized OLL executions across 22 cases, 22 recognized PLL executions across 12 cases - every solve links to its move-by-move breakdown.

tech
recon33776.542019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33767.852019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33757.342019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33748.862019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33737.552019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon25677.312017-05-28Indiana 2015
recon25668.312017-05-28Indiana 2015
recon25656.942017-05-28Indiana 2015
recon25647.582017-05-28Indiana 2015
recon25639.762017-05-28Indiana 2015
recon25628.002017-05-28US Nationals 2015
recon25617.022017-05-28US Nationals 2015
recon25608.922017-05-28US Nationals 2015
recon25598.942017-05-28US Nationals 2015
recon25588.072017-05-28US Nationals 2015
recon23035.502016-10-23Princeton Fall 2016
recon39003.722014-12-26unofficial1LLL
recon8947.292013-10-22unofficial
recon8938.762013-10-22unofficial
recon89210.892013-10-22unofficial
recon8917.352013-10-22unofficial
recon8908.032013-10-22unofficialVLS
recon22212.072013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013ZBLS
recon22110.332013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon2208.432013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon2199.242013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon2189.982013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013