Mats Valk

#34 most-reconstructed of 451 tracked solvers · search their solves

Years
solves
67
best
4.56
mean
7.30
span
2013–2019
competitions
15

Solving style vs the field

Compared against 12287 reconstructed solves by 451 tracked solvers.

Average moves per stage

themfieldΔ
Cross9.311.4-2.1
F2L33.729+4.7
OLL8.311.9-3.6
PLL15.313.1+2.2
Full solve66.765.5+1.2

Move tokens per reconstructed solve, split by stage - fewer than the field means a more move-efficient stage.

Techniques used

solvesthemfield
VLS1522.4%3.7%
ZBLS913.4%18.1%
1LLL57.5%8.3%
WV23.0%1.4%
ZBLL11.5%11.0%

Share of solves using each last-slot / last-layer technique, vs the share across all tracked solves.

Algorithm choices

mainstreamfielddiffering cases
OLL57%58%15/31
PLL60%59%6/17

"Mainstream" = share of their executions using the field's most common alg for that case. A lower number than the field average means a more unusual alg sheet.

OLL algorithms

49 recognized executions · 57% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 58%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 15 of 31 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
OLL 22 4
R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R ×3 (51 solvers)
M' U' R U R' U r' R2 U' B U' B' R' ×1 (1 solver)
R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R (44%)
OLL 26 3
R' U' R U' R' U2 R ×2 (71 solvers)
y R U2 R' U' R U' R' ×1 (53 solvers)
R' U' R U' R' U2 R (36%)
OLL 6 3
r U2 R' U' R U' r' ×3 (76 solvers)
r U2 R' U' R U' r' (93%)
OLL 7 3
r U R' U R U2 r' ×3 (84 solvers)
r U R' U R U2 r' (97%)
OLL 10 differs2
R U R' y R' F R U' R' F' R ×1 (14 solvers)
R U R' U R' F R F' R U2 R' ×1 (36 solvers)
R U R' U R' F R F' R U2 R' (67%)
OLL 12 differs2
R' M' U' R U' R' U2 R U' M ×2 (1 solver)
y' r R2 U' R U' R' U2 R U' r' R (49%)
OLL 24 differs2
y R U R D R' U' R D' R2 ×1 (4 solvers)
U' R U' R' U2 L R U' R' U L' U' ×1 (4 solvers)
r U R' U' r' F R F' (23%)
OLL 27 2
R U R' U R U2 R' ×1 (100 solvers)
y' R' U2 R U R' U R ×1 (35 solvers)
R U R' U R U2 R' (67%)
OLL 28 differs2
r U R' U' R r' U R U' R' ×2 (6 solvers)
r U R' U' r' R U R U' R' (75%)
OLL 40 2
y R' F R U R' U' F' U R ×2 (66 solvers)
y R' F R U R' U' F' U R (92%)
OLL 41 2
y2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R' U' F' ×2 (53 solvers)
y2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R' U' F' (88%)
OLL 43 2
y R' U' F' U F R ×2 (69 solvers)
y R' U' F' U F R (82%)
OLL 45 2
F R U R' U' F' ×2 (84 solvers)
F R U R' U' F' (90%)
OLL 11 1
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' ×1 (40 solvers)
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' (83%)
OLL 13 1
F U R U2 R' U' R U R' F' ×1 (22 solvers)
F U R U2 R' U' R U R' F' (29%)
OLL 15 differs1
x R' U' R r' U' L U l' U l U' ×1 (1 solver)
r' U' r R' U' R U r' U r (50%)
OLL 16 differs1
U2 r U r' R U R' U' L F' L' ×1 (1 solver)
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' (95%)
OLL 23 differs1
y2 R2 D' R U2 R' D R U2 R ×1 (33 solvers)
R2 D R' U2 R D' R' U2 R' (13%)
OLL 3 differs1
r' R2 U R' U r U2 r' U M' ×1 (3 solvers)
y' f R U R' U' f' U' F R U R' U' F' (63%)
OLL 31 1
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R ×1 (58 solvers)
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R (94%)
OLL 32 differs1
y2 L U F' U' L' U L F L' ×1 (13 solvers)
S R U R' U' R' F R f' (45%)
OLL 36 differs1
R' U' R U' R' U R U x' R U' R' U ×1 (13 solvers)
y2 L' U' L U' L' U L U L F' L' F (63%)
OLL 38 1
R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F' ×1 (64 solvers)
R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F' (96%)
OLL 44 1
y2 F U R U' R' F' ×1 (73 solvers)
y2 F U R U' R' F' (71%)
OLL 47 differs1
R' U' l' U R U' R' U R U' x' U R ×1 (4 solvers)
R' U' R' F R F' R' F R F' U R (21%)
OLL 48 differs1
M' R' r' R2 U' F R U R' U' R U R' U' F' ×1 (1 solver)
F R U R' U' R U R' U' F' (95%)
OLL 5 differs1
y2 l' U2 L U L' U l ×1 (48 solvers)
r' U2 R U R' U r (49%)
OLL 51 differs1
y' R' U' R' F R F' R U' R' U2 R ×1 (6 solvers)
y2 F U R U' R' U R U' R' F' (57%)
OLL 53 1
y r' U2 R U R' U' R U R' U r ×1 (17 solvers)
y r' U2 R U R' U' R U R' U r (37%)
OLL 57 differs1
R U R' U' r R' U R U' r' ×1 (19 solvers)
R U R' U' M' U R U' r' (73%)
OLL 9 1
y R U R' U' R' F R2 U R' U' F' ×1 (57 solvers)
y R U R' U' R' F R2 U R' U' F' (88%)

PLL algorithms

48 recognized executions · 60% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 59%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 6 of 17 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
T 7
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' ×7 (120 solvers)
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' (90%)
Ga differs6
U2 R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 U' D R' U R U D' ×3 (6 solvers)
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R D' ×1 (41 solvers)
U' R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 U' D R' U R U' D' ×1 (11 solvers)
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 U' D R' U R D' ×1 (17 solvers)
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R D' (38%)
Rb differs5
R' U2 R' D' R U' R' D R U R U' R' U' R ×5 (35 solvers)
R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R2 (63%)
Ua differs5
R2 U' R' U' R U R U R U' R ×2 (49 solvers)
y2 R U' R U R U R U' R' U' R2 ×2 (72 solvers)
U M2 U M' U2 R r' U M2 ×1 (1 solver)
R U R' U R' U' R2 U' R' U R' U R (39%)
Ra 4
y R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U2 R' ×4 (81 solvers)
y R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U2 R' (74%)
F 3
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R ×3 (89 solvers)
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R (92%)
Gc 3
y2 R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 ×2 (55 solvers)
R2 U' R U' R U R' U R2 D' U R U' R' D ×1 (18 solvers)
y2 R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 (55%)
Jb 3
R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' ×3 (132 solvers)
R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' (96%)
Ub 3
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 ×3 (43 solvers)
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 (31%)
Gd 2
R U R' U' D R2 U' R U' R' U R' U R2 D' ×2 (47 solvers)
R U R' U' D R2 U' R U' R' U R' U R2 D' (36%)
Aa differs1
x R' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R l U' ×1 (10 solvers)
x R' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 (44%)
Gb differs1
R' U' R U D' R2 U R' U R U' R U' R2 D ×1 (37 solvers)
y F' U' F R2 u R' U R U' R u' R2 (41%)
H 1
M2 U M2 U2 M2 U M2 ×1 (36 solvers)
M2 U M2 U2 M2 U M2 (44%)
Ja 1
L' U' L F L' U' L U L F' L2 U L ×1 (29 solvers)
L' U' L F L' U' L U L F' L2 U L (40%)
Nb 1
R' U R U' R' F' U' F R U R' F R' F' R U' R ×1 (12 solvers)
R' U R U' R' F' U' F R U R' F R' F' R U' R (31%)
Y 1
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' ×1 (94 solvers)
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' (96%)
Z differs1
y M2 U2 M' U M2 U M2 U M' ×1 (1 solver)
y R' U' R U' R U R U' R' U R U R2 U' R' (27%)

Solves

49 recognized OLL executions across 31 cases, 48 recognized PLL executions across 17 cases - every solve links to its move-by-move breakdown.

tech
recon33678.412019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019VLS
recon33666.122019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33657.422019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33647.572019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon33635.982019-08-29CubingUSA Nationals 2019
recon32418.602019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32408.022019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32397.012019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32386.542019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32376.762019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon27905.752017-09-04unofficial
recon27896.002017-09-04unofficial
recon27884.742017-09-04unofficial1LLL
recon27875.782017-09-04unofficial
recon27867.002017-09-04unofficial
recon27497.432017-07-06German Big Cube Open 2017
recon27485.932017-07-06German Big Cube Open 2017ZBLS
recon27476.522017-07-06German Big Cube Open 2017VLS
recon27466.902017-07-06German Big Cube Open 2017
recon27457.072017-07-06German Big Cube Open 2017ZBLS
recon27435.052017-07-03German Big Cube Open 2017ZBLL
recon26377.402017-05-30World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015
recon24874.562017-02-14unofficialVLS
recon23044.742016-11-06Jawa Timur Open 2016VLS
cuberoot4874.742016-11-05Jawa Timur Open 2016VLS
recon22995.132016-07-16European Rubik's Cube Championship 20161LLL
recon22337.612015-10-15China Championship 2015VLS
recon22326.622015-10-15China Championship 2015VLS
recon22316.892015-10-15China Championship 2015
recon22307.532015-10-15China Championship 2015
recon22299.042015-10-15China Championship 2015ZBLS
recon19566.612014-02-28Dutch Open 20131LLL
recon19546.552014-02-27European Rubik's Cube Championship 20121LLL
recon18657.772014-02-23Dutch Open 2012
recon18647.722014-02-23Dutch Open 2012ZBLS
recon18637.502014-02-23Dutch Open 2012
recon18626.272014-02-23Dutch Open 2012
recon18618.182014-02-23Dutch Open 2012
recon18398.132014-02-21Aachen Open 20101LLL
recon18236.142014-02-21unofficialVLS
recon5528.152013-09-12Eindhoven Open 2012
recon5517.532013-09-12Eindhoven Open 2012VLS
recon5507.252013-09-12Eindhoven Open 2012
recon54913.572013-09-12Eindhoven Open 2012
recon5487.632013-09-12Eindhoven Open 2012VLS
recon5046.412013-09-12Dutch Open 2011WV
recon5028.592013-09-12Dutch Open 2011VLS
recon50111.462013-09-12Dutch Open 2011ZBLS
recon2028.922013-08-20unofficial
recon2017.652013-08-20unofficial
recon2006.392013-08-20unofficialWV
recon1999.052013-08-20unofficial
recon1989.402013-08-20unofficialZBLS
recon1977.312013-08-20unofficial
recon1967.892013-08-20unofficial
recon1957.132013-08-20unofficial
recon19410.452013-08-20unofficial
recon1937.142013-08-20unofficialZBLS
recon1928.692013-08-20unofficialZBLS
recon1916.582013-08-20unofficialVLS
recon555.552013-08-09Zonhoven Open 2013VLS
recon1217.762013-08-09World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon1207.312013-08-09World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013ZBLS
recon1197.612013-08-09World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon1189.522013-08-09World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon1178.812013-08-09World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013VLS
cuberoot4845.552013-03-02Zonhoven Open 2013VLS