Michał Rzewuski

#75 most-reconstructed of 451 tracked solvers · search their solves

Years
solves
21
best
5.82
mean
8.09
span
2015–2019
competitions
5

Solving style vs the field

Compared against 12287 reconstructed solves by 451 tracked solvers.

Average moves per stage

themfieldΔ
Cross10.911.4-0.5
F2L36.929+7.9
OLL11.311.9-0.6
PLL16.113.1+3
Full solve75.365.5+9.8

Move tokens per reconstructed solve, split by stage - fewer than the field means a more move-efficient stage.

Techniques used

solvesthemfield
ZBLS29.5%18.1%
2GLL14.8%3.4%
VLS14.8%3.7%

Share of solves using each last-slot / last-layer technique, vs the share across all tracked solves.

Algorithm choices

mainstreamfielddiffering cases
OLL63%58%6/18
PLL41%59%6/10

"Mainstream" = share of their executions using the field's most common alg for that case. A lower number than the field average means a more unusual alg sheet.

OLL algorithms

19 recognized executions · 63% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 58%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 6 of 18 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
OLL 32 differs2
R U B' U' R' U R B R' ×1 (12 solvers)
r B U' x' U' L' U L F L' ×1 (1 solver)
S R U R' U' R' F R f' (45%)
OLL 11 1
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' ×1 (40 solvers)
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' (83%)
OLL 16 1
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' ×1 (59 solvers)
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' (95%)
OLL 21 differs1
y F R U R' U' R U R' U' R U R' U' F' ×1 (5 solvers)
y R U2 R' U' R U R' U' R U' R' (30%)
OLL 23 differs1
U R' U2 R2 U R2 U R U' R U R' U' R U' R' U ×1 (6 solvers)
R2 D R' U2 R D' R' U2 R' (13%)
OLL 25 differs1
F R' F' r U R U' r' ×1 (26 solvers)
y F' r U R' U' r' F R (20%)
OLL 28 differs1
y' r' U' R U M' U' R' U R ×1 (3 solvers)
r U R' U' r' R U R U' R' (75%)
OLL 29 1
y R U R' U' R U' R' F' U' F R U R' ×1 (33 solvers)
y R U R' U' R U' R' F' U' F R U R' (63%)
OLL 31 1
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R ×1 (58 solvers)
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R (94%)
OLL 35 1
R U2 R2 F R F' R U2 R' ×1 (57 solvers)
R U2 R2 F R F' R U2 R' (91%)
OLL 39 differs1
y' R U R' F' U' F U R U2 R' ×1 (17 solvers)
y L F' L' U' L U F U' L' (45%)
OLL 41 1
y2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R' U' F' ×1 (53 solvers)
y2 R U R' U R U2 R' F R U R' U' F' (88%)
OLL 44 1
y2 F U R U' R' F' ×1 (73 solvers)
y2 F U R U' R' F' (71%)
OLL 45 1
F R U R' U' F' ×1 (84 solvers)
F R U R' U' F' (90%)
OLL 48 1
F R U R' U' R U R' U' F' ×1 (63 solvers)
F R U R' U' R U R' U' F' (95%)
OLL 51 1
y2 F U R U' R' U R U' R' F' ×1 (35 solvers)
y2 F U R U' R' U R U' R' F' (57%)
OLL 57 1
R U R' U' M' U R U' r' ×1 (33 solvers)
R U R' U' M' U R U' r' (73%)
OLL 6 1
r U2 R' U' R U' r' ×1 (76 solvers)
r U2 R' U' R U' r' (93%)

PLL algorithms

17 recognized executions · 41% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 59%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 6 of 10 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
Ub differs4
U R' M' r U' M U2 M' U' M2 U2 ×2 (1 solver)
y2 R2 U R U R' U' R' U' R' U R' ×1 (55 solvers)
U' R' M' r U' M U2 M' U' M' R' r U' ×1 (1 solver)
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 (31%)
Aa differs2
l' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R l ×1 (18 solvers)
l' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 ×1 (12 solvers)
x R' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 (44%)
Ga 2
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R D' ×2 (41 solvers)
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R D' (38%)
Gc 2
y2 R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 ×2 (55 solvers)
y2 R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 (55%)
Ra 2
y R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U2 R' ×2 (81 solvers)
y R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U2 R' (74%)
Gb differs1
R' U' R U D' R2 U R' U R U' R U' R2 D ×1 (37 solvers)
y F' U' F R2 u R' U R U' R u' R2 (41%)
H differs1
M2 U' M2 U2 M2 U' M2 ×1 (37 solvers)
M2 U M2 U2 M2 U M2 (44%)
Ja differs1
U R' U L' U2 R U' R' U2 R2 L R' U' ×1 (1 solver)
L' U' L F L' U' L U L F' L2 U L (40%)
Rb 1
R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R2 ×1 (86 solvers)
R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R2 (63%)
Z differs1
y M2 U' M2 U' M' U2 M2 U2 M' ×1 (11 solvers)
y R' U' R U' R U R U' R' U R U R2 U' R' (27%)

Solves

19 recognized OLL executions across 18 cases, 17 recognized PLL executions across 10 cases - every solve links to its move-by-move breakdown.

tech
recon328610.692019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32857.812019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32849.892019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon328310.842019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon32828.382019-08-24Warm Up Sydney 2019
recon31867.882019-08-24WCA World Championship 2019
recon31857.262019-08-24WCA World Championship 2019
recon31847.362019-08-24WCA World Championship 2019
recon31838.532019-08-24WCA World Championship 2019
recon31828.042019-08-24WCA World Championship 2019
recon31066.922019-05-27GLS Cup I 2019
recon31055.822019-05-27GLS Cup I 2019
recon31046.892019-05-27GLS Cup I 2019
recon31036.552019-05-27GLS Cup I 20192GLL
recon31028.462019-05-27GLS Cup I 2019ZBLS
recon24237.622017-02-01Santa Claus Cube Race 2016
recon24227.252017-02-01Santa Claus Cube Race 2016
recon24217.942017-02-01Santa Claus Cube Race 2016
recon24208.452017-02-01Santa Claus Cube Race 2016ZBLS
recon24198.622017-02-01Santa Claus Cube Race 2016
recon21938.602015-06-07Gdańsk Open 2015VLS