Rowe Hessler

#63 most-reconstructed of 451 tracked solvers · search their solves

Years
solves
29
best
5.57
mean
10.18
span
2013–2014
competitions
9

Solving style vs the field

Compared against 12287 reconstructed solves by 451 tracked solvers.

Average moves per stage

themfieldΔ
Cross10.111.4-1.3
F2L34.629+5.6
OLL11.911.9±0
PLL14.313.1+1.2
Full solve70.965.5+5.4

Move tokens per reconstructed solve, split by stage - fewer than the field means a more move-efficient stage.

Techniques used

solvesthemfield
1LLL517.2%8.3%
VLS13.4%3.7%

Share of solves using each last-slot / last-layer technique, vs the share across all tracked solves.

Algorithm choices

mainstreamfielddiffering cases
OLL52%58%9/22
PLL26%59%7/10

"Mainstream" = share of their executions using the field's most common alg for that case. A lower number than the field average means a more unusual alg sheet.

OLL algorithms

27 recognized executions · 52% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 58%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 9 of 22 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
OLL 50 differs3
y2 R' F R2 B' R2 F' R2 B R' ×2 (11 solvers)
U' x R' U z' U2 R' U2 z U' R2 z' R U' x' ×1 (1 solver)
r' U r2 U' r2 U' r2 U r' (54%)
OLL 30 2
y2 F U R U2 R' U' R U2 R' U' F' ×1 (19 solvers)
U' x U R' U x' R2 U' R' U' R U R' y' R2 ×1 (1 solver)
y2 F U R U2 R' U' R U2 R' U' F' (35%)
OLL 43 2
y R' U' F' U F R ×2 (69 solvers)
y R' U' F' U F R (82%)
OLL 46 2
R' U' R' F R F' U R ×1 (69 solvers)
R' U' R' F R f' x' y' U D' x U R ×1 (1 solver)
R' U' R' F R F' U R (91%)
OLL 10 differs1
R U R' y R' F R U' R' F' R ×1 (14 solvers)
R U R' U R' F R F' R U2 R' (67%)
OLL 15 1
r' U' r R' U' R U r' U r ×1 (32 solvers)
r' U' r R' U' R U r' U r (50%)
OLL 16 1
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' ×1 (59 solvers)
r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' (95%)
OLL 18 1
r U R' U R U2 r2 U' R U' R' U2 r ×1 (10 solvers)
r U R' U R U2 r2 U' R U' R' U2 r (32%)
OLL 19 differs1
M U R U R' U' r R2 F R F' ×1 (3 solvers)
r' R U R U R' U' r R2 F R F' (53%)
OLL 2 1
F R U R' U' F' f R U R' U' f' ×1 (12 solvers)
F R U R' U' F' f R U R' U' f' (31%)
OLL 28 1
r U R' U' r' R U R U' R' ×1 (56 solvers)
r U R' U' r' R U R U' R' (75%)
OLL 3 differs1
r' R2 U R' U r U2 r' U r R' ×1 (3 solvers)
y' f R U R' U' f' U' F R U R' U' F' (63%)
OLL 31 1
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R ×1 (58 solvers)
R' U' F U R U' R' F' R (94%)
OLL 32 differs1
R U B' U' R' U R B R' ×1 (12 solvers)
S R U R' U' R' F R f' (45%)
OLL 33 differs1
U' z U' R' U R U y' R' U' R x' ×1 (1 solver)
R U R' U' R' F R F' (91%)
OLL 38 differs1
U R U R' U R U' R' U' x R' U R U' x' ×1 (2 solvers)
R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F' (96%)
OLL 39 1
y L F' L' U' L U F U' L' ×1 (33 solvers)
y L F' L' U' L U F U' L' (45%)
OLL 42 1
R' U' R U' R' U2 R F R U R' U' F' ×1 (42 solvers)
R' U' R U' R' U2 R F R U R' U' F' (48%)
OLL 44 1
y2 F U R U' R' F' ×1 (73 solvers)
y2 F U R U' R' F' (71%)
OLL 5 differs1
y2 l' U2 L U L' U l ×1 (48 solvers)
r' U2 R U R' U r (49%)
OLL 52 differs1
R' U' R U' R' d R' U R B ×1 (8 solvers)
R U R' U R U' B U' B' R' (25%)
OLL 53 1
y r' U2 R U R' U' R U R' U r ×1 (17 solvers)
y r' U2 R U R' U' R U R' U r (37%)

PLL algorithms

19 recognized executions · 26% done with the field's most common alg for the case (field average 59%) · go-to alg differs from the field's on 7 of 10 cases

caseusestheir algsfield's most common
Ga differs4
R2 u R' U R' U' R u' R2 y' R' U R ×3 (27 solvers)
U2 R2 u R' U R' U' R u' R y' B R' U R U' ×1 (3 solvers)
R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R D' (38%)
T differs4
R U R' U' x R' U x' R2 U' R' U' R U R' y' R' U ×2 (1 solver)
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' ×1 (120 solvers)
U' R U R' U' R' f S' R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U' ×1 (1 solver)
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' (90%)
V differs3
R' U R' U' y R' F' R2 U' R' U R' F R F ×2 (24 solvers)
R' U R' d' R' F' R2 U' R' U R' F R F ×1 (45 solvers)
R' U R' d' R' F' R2 U' R' U R' F R F (33%)
Ua differs2
R2 U' R' U' R U R U R U' R ×2 (49 solvers)
R U R' U R' U' R2 U' R' U R' U R (39%)
F 1
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R ×1 (89 solvers)
y R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R (92%)
Gb differs1
R' d' F R2 u R' U R U' R u' R2 ×1 (23 solvers)
y F' U' F R2 u R' U R U' R u' R2 (41%)
Gd differs1
R U R' y' R2 u' R U' R' U R' u R2 ×1 (34 solvers)
R U R' U' D R2 U' R U' R' U R' U R2 D' (36%)
Rb 1
R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R2 ×1 (86 solvers)
R' U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F' R2 (63%)
Ub 1
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 ×1 (43 solvers)
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 (31%)
Y differs1
U' R2 U' R' U R U' x' U' z' U' R U' R' U' r y R U' ×1 (1 solver)
F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' (96%)

Solves

27 recognized OLL executions across 22 cases, 19 recognized PLL executions across 10 cases - every solve links to its move-by-move breakdown.

tech
recon19377.062014-02-26Toronto Fall 20101LLL
recon13185.692014-01-21unofficial1LLL
recon13176.342014-01-21unofficial1LLL
recon12899.772014-01-20World Rubik's Cube Championship 2009
recon127114.772014-01-17MIT Fall 2011
recon127016.282014-01-17MIT Fall 2011
recon126919.222014-01-17MIT Fall 2011
recon126813.712014-01-17MIT Fall 2011
recon126713.252014-01-17MIT Fall 2011
recon9565.692014-01-10unofficial
recon7859.132013-10-07US Nationals and Open 20081LLL
recon7617.772013-10-06Harvard Fall 2013
recon5009.902013-09-12World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011
recon49910.022013-09-12World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011
recon49810.612013-09-12World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011
recon4978.772013-09-12World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011
recon4968.522013-09-12World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011
recon3585.572013-09-04unofficial
recon3366.942013-09-04MIT Fall 20101LLL
recon25713.212013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon25610.752013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon2559.572013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon2548.472013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013
recon25311.712013-08-28World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013VLS
recon4810.632013-08-09US Nationals 2012
recon479.842013-08-09US Nationals 2012
recon4611.192013-08-09US Nationals 2012
recon4511.032013-08-09US Nationals 2012
recon449.912013-08-09US Nationals 2012